business analyst
46.1K views | +0 today
Follow
business analyst
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by michel verstrepen from Complex systems and projects
Scoop.it!

Managing complexity: a practical example

In Switzerland, there are more than 4'000 contaminated sites needing remediation in the next decades. Some of the remediation projects are especially large – over 100 Millions € - and highly complex. On behalf of the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), the authors developed a guideline (in press) to support the authorities which are challenged by such complex projects.
After having identified the success factors and key challenges of three sites being currently remediated, a project typology, based on four dimensions (technical, legal, socio-relational and management), has been developed. Further, a complexity grid, inspired by the project complexity model of Kathleen Hass, has been developed, allowing a qualitative identification of the main sources of complexity. Finally, success factors, recommendations and tools for key elements like goal-setting, decision-making and steering, stakeholder-management, project-organisation, participation and communication, planning, uncertainty and risk-management, culture and leadership, are suggested.


Via Philippe Vallat
enrique rubio royo's comment, November 6, 2012 8:50 AM
Thank you Philippe
Philippe Vallat's comment, November 6, 2012 4:39 PM
Thanks for rescooping!
Rescooped by michel verstrepen from Complex systems and projects
Scoop.it!

How action mapping can change your design process

How action mapping can change your design process | business analyst | Scoop.it

Action mapping makes stakeholders work together to analyze the performance problem, commit to the same measurable goal, and agree to focus on activities rather than information. This can be a big change to the typical course development workflow.


Via Philippe Vallat
lelapin's comment January 22, 2012 2:44 AM
I failed to see the difference between the two scenarios. The first one was simpler and shorter so I guess, intuitively, that's the one I'd adopt.
Rescooped by michel verstrepen from Sustainable Futures
Scoop.it!

The New Architecture of Smart Cities

The New Architecture of Smart Cities | business analyst | Scoop.it
What makes a city a “Smart City” as opposed to a city where some “smart things” happen?

 

Three obvious criteria for answering that question stand out:

1. Smart Cities are led from the top – they have a strong and visionary leader championing the Smart agenda across the city. 

2. Smart Cities have a stakeholder forum – they have drawn together a community of city stakeholders across the city. Those stakeholders have not only created a compelling vision for a Smart City; they have committed to taking an ongoing role coordinating a programme to deliver it. 

3. Smart Cities invest in technology infrastructure – they are deploying the required information and communication technology (ICT) platforms across the city; and doing so in such a way as to support the integration of information and activity across city systems.

 

It’s also important, though, to consider what is different about the structure and organisation of city systems in a Smart City. How does a city decide which technology infrastructures are required? Which organizations will make use of them, and how? How can they be designed and delivered so that they effectively serve individuals, communities and businesses in the city? What other structures and processes are required to achieve this progress in a Smart City?

 

Read on to learn about the design of the infrastructures and systems of Smart Cities and view  them visually represented in an accompanying diagram.


Via Lauren Moss, Flora Moon
No comment yet.