Distance Learning, mLearning, Digital Education, Technology
12.1K views | +0 today
Follow
Distance Learning, mLearning, Digital Education, Technology
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Dennis Swender from Educational Psychology & Emerging Technologies: Critical Perspectives and Updates
Scoop.it!

Time for a Pause: Without Effective Public Oversight, AI in Schools Will Do More Harm Than Good // National Education Policy Center 

Key Takeaway: The current wholesale adoption of unregulated Artificial Intelligence applications in schools poses a grave danger to democratic civil society and to individual freedom and liberty.

Find Documents:

NEPC Publication: https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/ai

Publication Announcement: https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication-announcement/2024/03/ai

Contact:
Michelle Renée Valladares: (720) 505-1958, michelle.valladares@colorado.edu
Ben Williamson: 011-44-0131-651-6176, ben.williamson@ed.ac.uk

 

BOULDER, CO (MARCH 5, 2024)
Disregarding their own widely publicized appeals for regulating and slowing implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), leading tech giants like Google, Microsoft, and Meta are instead racing to evade regulation and incorporate AI into their platforms. 

 

A new NEPC policy brief, Time for a Pause: Without Effective Public Oversight, AI in Schools Will Do More Harm Than Good, warns of the dangers of unregulated AI in schools, highlighting democracy and privacy concerns. Authors Ben Williamson of the University of Edinburgh, and Alex Molnar and Faith Boninger of the University of Colorado Boulder, examine the evidence and conclude that the proliferation of AI in schools jeopardizes democratic values and personal freedoms.

Public education is a public and private good that’s essential to democratic civic life. The public must, therefore, be able to provide meaningful direction over schools through transparent democratic governance structures. Yet important discussions about AI’s potentially negative impacts on education are being overwhelmed by relentless rhetoric promoting its purported ability to positively transform teaching and learning. The result is that AI, with little public oversight, is on the verge of becoming a routine and overriding presence in schools.

Years of warnings and precedents have highlighted the risks posed by the widespread use of pre-AI digital technologies in education, which have obscured decision-making and enabled student data exploitation. Without effective public oversight, the introduction of opaque and unproven AI systems and applications will likely exacerbate these problems.

The authors explore the harms likely if lawmakers and others do not step in with carefully considered regulations. Integration of AI can degrade teacher-student relationships, corrupt curriculum with misinformation, encourage student performance bias, and lock schools into a system of expensive corporate technology. Further, they contend, AI is likely to exacerbate violations of student privacy, increase surveillance, and further reduce the transparency and accountability of educational decision-making.

 

The authors advise that without responsible development and regulation, these opaque AI models and applications will become enmeshed in routine school processes. This will force students and teachers to become involuntary test subjects in a giant experiment in automated instruction and administration that is sure to be rife with unintended consequences and potentially negative effects. Once enmeshed, the only way to disentangle from AI would be to completely dismantle those systems.

The policy brief concludes by suggesting measures to prevent these extensive risks. Perhaps most importantly, the authors urge school leaders to pause the adoption of AI applications until policymakers have had sufficient time to thoroughly educate themselves and develop legislation and policies ensuring effective public oversight and control of its school applications.

 

Find Time for a Pause: Without Effective Public Oversight, AI in Schools Will Do More Harm Than Good, by Ben Williamson, Alex Molnar, and Faith Boninger, at:
http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/ai

_______

Suggested Citation: Williamson, B., Molnar, A., & Boninger, F. (2024). Time for a pause: Without effective public oversight, AI in schools will do more harm than good. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved [date] from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/ai

 

For original link to announcement, please see: 
https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication-announcement/2024/03/ai ;

 


Via Roxana Marachi, PhD
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Dennis Swender from Learning & Mind & Brain
Scoop.it!

Stephen's Web ~ Building and Sustaining National Educational Technology Agencies : Lessons, Models and Case Studies from Around the World

Stephen's Web ~ Building and Sustaining National Educational Technology Agencies : Lessons, Models and Case Studies from Around the World | Distance Learning, mLearning, Digital Education, Technology | Scoop.it
It took a bit of time to read this report (226 page PDF) but it's worth the effort, especially if you're in the position of designing a national education technology initiative. "This study on national ICT/education agencies seeks to provide some insights that may help answer two lead questions: 1. What do we know about the form, functions and characteristics of such organizations? 2. What are some key considerations and lessons related to their establishment, operation, and oversight?" The introductory section is probably the most use (especially the section describing the "key issues for policymakers"). The recommendations are probably too vague to be helpful, but the wealth of detail in the eleven cases from countries around the world (including two which were eventually shut down, Australia's EdNA (by Gerald White & Lesley Parker) and Britain's Becta (by Gavin Dykes)). Canada gets a paragraph about Schoolnet in the closing 'Other Initiatives' chapter, though given the focus on the role of national agencies in technology deployment I would have thought CANARIE might also rate a mention.

Via Miloš Bajčetić
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Dennis Swender from Information and digital literacy in education via the digital path
Scoop.it!

Scaling up online education? More haste less speed

Scaling up online education? More haste less speed | Distance Learning, mLearning, Digital Education, Technology | Scoop.it

This guest blog has been kindly contributed by Professor Neil Morris, Chair in Educational Technology, School of Education, University of Leeds. He can be found at @NeilMorrisLeeds

 

The Unbundled University research project, funded by the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC grant number ES/P002102/1) and the National Research Foundation in South Africa (NRF grant number 105395), explored a range of issues in relation to the expansion of online education in universities in the UK and South Africa, including partnerships with private companies and the disaggregation of learning and teaching materials for delivery online (‘unbundling’).

 

Data were collected from interviews with senior leaders, academics, students and private companies in both countries. The data are being written up for publication in academic journals, but given the rapid shift to focus on online education as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is evident that some of the headlines from the research need to be put in the public domain rapidly.


Via Elizabeth E Charles
Elizabeth E Charles's curator insight, May 1, 2020 4:15 PM

A timely report with the mass move to online teaching/learning.