Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Why didn’t we have more video? The short answer is budget and time: making good-quality videos is expensive & making simple yet effective educational videos is time consuming, if not necessarily costly. #NumericalMOOC was created on-the-fly, with little budget. But here’s my point: expensive, high-production-value videos are not necessary to achieve a quality learning experience. Via Peter Mellow 
|
Scoop.it!
From
-
September 4, 2014 5:05 AM
edX recently commissioned a study of nearly 1,000 videos, segmenting them out by by video type and production style, and discovered this among their other findings: Shorter videos are more engaging. Engagement drops after 6 minutes.Videos with a more personal feeling are more effective than high-fidelity studio recordings.Videos in which the instructor speaks quickly and with high enthusiasm are more engaging.Khan-style tablet drawings are more engaging than power point slides.
Rosemary Tyrrell, Ed.D.'s curator insight,
September 4, 2014 4:23 PM
An interesting study from the EdX people on using videos in an online course. |
Instructional design is the most important thing but audiovisual resources can also be produced with quality and low cost using narrated presentations and other easy similar techniques