Monstrous amounts of data
Research and publish the best content.
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Already have an account: Login
ED 262 Research, Reference & Resource Skills
2.1K views |
+0 today
View related curated articles on Flipboard / Research & Resource Skills at http://flip.it/mWcVKd
Curated by
Dennis Swender
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
A classic essay defines different ways to disagree, from the worst to the best, with lessons that ring true in our divisive times. 
Scoop.it!
We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That's an impossibility for science.
FlashWebsiteHeader's curator insight,
February 26, 2018 4:23 AM
This guarantees a snappier stacking time. Some portion of the motion picture will stack immediately, and the watcher will have the capacity to see it. As the individual perspectives the motion picture, the rest of the part will stick out of sight. Along these lines, for the watcher, there is definitely no stacking time.flash website header design
Scoop.it!
1. In the 1990s researchers from the Max Planck Institute in Berlin conducted what seemed like routine man-in-the-street interviews: they asked pedestrians to tell them, off the tops of their heads, the names of German businesses. Led by the psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer, the researchers then constructed a stock portfolio made up of companies mentioned by …
Scoop.it!
Via Thomas Menk
|
Scoop.it!
People appear to know other people better than they know themselves, at least when it comes to predicting future behaviour and achievement. Why?
Scoop.it!
UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH: What do we actually mean by research and how does it help inform our understanding of things? Those people looking for proof to come from any research in science will be sadly disappointed…
Scoop.it!
Why this Yale psychologist thinks you should be compassionate, not empathetic.
Scoop.it!
Psychiatrist Richard Friedman surprised himself one day during a routine appointment with a patient experiencing anxiety about a financial problem. Bothered by something in his patient Mark's appearance, Dr. Friedman "did something out of pure intuition that I didn't fully understand at the moment. I called his internist while he was in my office and sent him for an appointment a few hours later." Dr. Friedman was puzzled by his own gut reaction. He routinely encountered people suffering from anxiety and his patient had no previous history of medical illness. He was also worried about what his internist colleague would think—would he laugh? As it turned out Mark's internist did not have reason to laugh. Mark was not just suffering from anxiety, but health complications in his lung. Care began immediately and Mark's condition improved. How many healthcare professionals have similar experiences? If they do, how many are willing to admit it? And how would you have felt if you had been Mark? Would you have wanted to make a separate trip to an internist just based on Dr. Friedman's intuition? .... Via Thomas Menk
|
