Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Sie lügen und betrügen, um ans Ziel zu kommen: Systeme mit Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) sind in der Lage, Menschen zu täuschen – selbst wenn sie darauf trainiert wurden, hilfreich und ehrlich zu sein. Das ist das Ergebnis einer Übersichtsstudie von Forschern am Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge (US-Bundesstaat Massachusetts), die in der Fachzeitschrift "Patterns" veröffentlicht wurde. In dem Beitrag forderten die Wissenschaftler die Politik auf, so schnell wie möglich strenge Vorschriften zu entwickeln, um KI-Systeme in die Schranken zu weisen.
Via Gust MEES
Google has released an open AI model called Gemma, which it says is created using the same research and technology that was used to build its Gemini AI models. The company says Gemma is its contribution to the open community and is meant to help developers "in building AI responsibly." As such, it also introduced the Responsible Generative AI Toolkit alongside Gemma. It contains a debugging tool, as well as a guide with best practices for AI development based on Google's experience.
Via Gust MEES
Discover Artificial Intelligence tools for education. A comprehensive directory of AI tools that can help transform the classroom.
Via Gust MEES
Microsoft says it’s using conversational AI to create a new way to browse the web. Users will be able to chat to Bing like ChatGPT, asking questions and receiving answers in natural language. More powerful than ChatGPT': Microsoft unveils new AI-improved Bing and Edge browser Microsoft has tapped OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, to help it improve its Bing search engine, while also improving its web browser.
Via Gust MEES
Some of the world’s biggest academic journal publishers have banned or curbed their authors from using the advanced chatbot, ChatGPT. Because the bot uses information from the internet to produce highly readable answers to questions, the publishers are worried that inaccurate or plagiarised work could enter the pages of academic literature.
Several researchers have already listed the chatbot as a co-author on academic studies, and some publishers have moved to ban this practice. But the editor-in-chief of Science, one of the top scientific journals in the world, has gone a step further and forbidden any use of text from the program in submitted papers.
Via Gust MEES
La technologie d'IA de ChatGPT repose actuellement sur 175 milliards de paramètres et a été entraînée avec des centaines de milliards de textes. La base de connaissances s'arrête toutefois à 2021. ChatGPT est à l'aise dans des domaines divers et variés, y compris pour générer du code.
Avec ChatGPT Plus, OpenAI propose un abonnement à 20 dollars par mois. Pour le moment, la disponibilité concerne uniquement les États-Unis. L'invitation de personnes sur liste d'attente va commencer au cours des prochaines semaines. D'autres pays s'ajouteront ultérieurement.
Via Gust MEES
Is ChatGPT the new teacher’s aide?
Teachers have said that the artificial intelligence tool, which can write anything with just a simple prompt, could save them hours of work—a game-changer at a time when teachers have a lot on their plates and stress levels are high.
Even so, some teachers say they worry that using the tool could strip away some of the creativity and relational aspects of teaching or introduce bias into lessons or feedback on student work.
Via Gust MEES
The difference we have with ChatGPT is that it doesn’t so much present a threat to the university experience, but rather directly into the heart of the purpose of a university education – its ability to ‘teach you how to think’. There have been shadows of this in the past, for instance the hostility towards Wikipedia (Coomer 2013), the emergence of essay mills, not to mention simple, now common place tools such as spell checkers and calculators. I remember vividly a very angry professor in the early 2000s telling me that reading lists with hyperlinks would make students baby birds, with wide open mouths expecting to be spoon fed. We’ve pretty much moved through all those advancements in technology and realised their benefits, but this one, I would argue, is different. Not because it does not have its benefits, but because of the sheer volume and scale of what’s coming will be meaningfully different and ultimately challenge the foundations upon which we measure that ability to think – university assessment. Learn more / En savoir plus / Mehr erfahren: https://www.scoop.it/topic/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=ChatGPT https://www.scoop.it/t/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=AI https://www.scoop.it/topic/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=Ethics
Via Edumorfosis, Gust MEES
Instead of giving another "hot take" on Chat GPT I created a list of thoughtful articles and videos that will help you form your own opinion.
Via Tom D'Amico (@TDOttawa)
Using an artificial intelligence technique inspired by theories about how the brain recognizes patterns, technology companies are reporting startling gains in fields as diverse as computer vision, speech recognition and the identification of promising new molecules for designing drugs. The advances have led to widespread enthusiasm among researchers who design software to perform human activities like seeing, listening and thinking. They offer the promise of machines that converse with humans and perform tasks like driving cars and working in factories, raising the specter of automated robots that could replace human workers.
Via Szabolcs Kósa
|
Meta et IBM réunis pour promouvoir une approche open source du développement de l’IA Technologie : L’alliance pour l’IA, qui compte 50 membres, promeut une IA responsable et open source. Google, Microsoft et OpenAI ont une vision différente.
Via Gust MEES, Bruno De Lièvre
Ask your students, What do you know or have you heard about ChatGPT? Have you experimented with it yourself? What did you think of it? What questions do you have?
Depending on their responses, they may need a broad introduction to the tool. If so, we recommend an episode of The Daily called “Did Artificial Intelligence Just Get Too Smart?” (Students can follow along via the transcript.)
Via Edumorfosis, Gust MEES
More powerful than ChatGPT': Microsoft unveils new AI-improved Bing and Edge browser Microsoft has tapped OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, to help it improve its Bing search engine, while also improving its web browser.
Via Gust MEES
ChatGPT is only two months old, but we've spent the time since it debuted debating how powerful it really is — and how we should regulate it.
Just because it can be helpful doesn't mean it can't also be harmful: Students can use it to write essays for them, and bad actors can use it to create malware. Even without malicious intent from users, it can generate misleading information, reflect biases, generate offensive content, store sensitive information, and — some people fear — degrade everyone's critical thinking skills due to over-reliance. Then there's the ever-present (if a bit unfounded) fear that RoBoTs ArE tAkInG oVeR.
And ChatGPT can do all of that without much — if any — oversight from the U.S. government.
Via Gust MEES
PARIS, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Sciences Po, one of France's top universities, has banned the use of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-based chatbot that can generate coherent prose, to prevent fraud and plagiarism.
ChatGPT is a free programme that generates original text about virtually any subject in response to a prompt, including articles, essays, jokes and even poetry, raising concerns across industries about plagiarism.
Via Gust MEES
Despite all the teething problems, the results are impressive, disturbing, and impressively disturbing. The entire academic world, from elementary schools to top universities, is in turmoil, some out of dystopian panic, others out of utopian naiveté. Both positions are highly understandable.
For all readers to whom ChatGPT does not mean anything yet, we have asked ChatGPT to introduce itself briefly:
Via Edumorfosis, Gust MEES
The New Normal isn’t new anymore. The world of eLearning has changed forever, and it’s not going back. Even if students are returning to school, and eventually it happens - the model of a teacher, a whiteboard, and dozens of students sitting on chairs has changed forever. Instead, multitudes of new learning tools have entered the classroom. Technologies such as conversational AI, which were used mainly in textual interfaces and for commercial purposes, have entered this field.
Chatbots became a commodity only by the mid-2010s, but for lots of people they’re already falling out of favor. Honestly, I don’t blame them. Most of the conversations with them are robotic (no pun intended), mundane and limited in their scope. Most of their uses are commercial. Most of the bots are textual, and in a world turning to video, they are being left behind like educators who haven’t mastered the usage of online platforms. Learn more / En savoir plus / Mehr erfahren: https://www.scoop.it/topic/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=Metaverse
Via Edumorfosis, Gust MEES
|
Sie lügen und betrügen, um ans Ziel zu kommen: Systeme mit Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) sind in der Lage, Menschen zu täuschen – selbst wenn sie darauf trainiert wurden, hilfreich und ehrlich zu sein. Das ist das Ergebnis einer Übersichtsstudie von Forschern am Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge (US-Bundesstaat Massachusetts), die in der Fachzeitschrift "Patterns" veröffentlicht wurde. In dem Beitrag forderten die Wissenschaftler die Politik auf, so schnell wie möglich strenge Vorschriften zu entwickeln, um KI-Systeme in die Schranken zu weisen.
Learn more / En savoir plus / Mehr erfahren:
https://www.scoop.it/topic/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=ChatGPT
https://www.scoop.it/t/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=AI
https://www.scoop.it/topic/21st-century-innovative-technologies-and-developments/?&tag=Ethics