gpmt

Sie lügen und betrügen, um ans Ziel zu kommen: Systeme mit Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) sind in der Lage, Menschen zu täuschen – selbst wenn sie darauf trainiert wurden, hilfreich und ehrlich zu sein. Das ist das Ergebnis einer Übersichtsstudie von Forschern am Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge (US-Bundesstaat Massachusetts), die in der Fachzeitschrift "Patterns" veröffentlicht wurde. In dem Beitrag forderten die Wissenschaftler die Politik auf, so schnell wie möglich strenge Vorschriften zu entwickeln, um KI-Systeme in die Schranken zu weisen.

 

Via Gust MEES

@media print { .ms-editor-squiggler { display:none !important; } } .ms-editor-squiggler { all: initial; display: block !important; height: 0px !important; width: 0px !important; }
Via Alenka Andrin, LGA

Via Tom D'Amico (@TDOttawa)

Following our annual tussle with hundreds of studies of merit, we’ve pared them down to 10 you shouldn’t miss—from what AI can (and can’t) do to the neuroscience of brain synchrony.

Via Tom D'Amico (@TDOttawa) , juandoming

Some of the world’s biggest academic journal publishers have banned or curbed their authors from using the advanced chatbot, ChatGPT. Because the bot uses information from the internet to produce highly readable answers to questions, the publishers are worried that inaccurate or plagiarised work could enter the pages of academic literature.

Several researchers have already listed the chatbot as a co-author on academic studies, and some publishers have moved to ban this practice. But the editor-in-chief of Science, one of the top scientific journals in the world, has gone a step further and forbidden any use of text from the program in submitted papers.

 

Via Gust MEES

These days, it seems my students can’t let a minute go by without checking TikTok and Instagram or responding to their friend’s latest post on Snapchat. Teens’ widespread access to smartphones for …

Via Tom D'Amico (@TDOttawa)

— Breaking up and spacing out study time over days or weeks can substantially boost how much of the material students retain, and for longer, compared to lumping everything into a single, nose-to-the-grindstone session.

— Varying the studying environment — by hitting the books in, say, a cafe or garden rather than only hunkering down in the library, or even by listening to different background music — can help reinforce and sharpen the memory of what you learn.

— A 15-minute break to go for a walk or trawl on social media isn’t necessarily wasteful procrastination. Distractions and interruptions can allow for mental “incubation” and flashes of insight — but only if you’ve been working at a problem for a while and get stuck, according to a 2009 research meta-analysis.

— Quizzing oneself on new material, such as by reciting it aloud from memory or trying to tell a friend about it, is a far more powerful way to master information than just re-reading it, according to work by researchers including Henry Roediger III and Jeffrey Karpicke. (Roediger has co-authored his own book, “Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning.”)

 

Learn more / En savoir plus / Mehr erfahren:

 

https://gustmees.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/time-the-most-important-factor-neglected-in-education/

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/21st-century-learning-and-teaching/?tag=Brain

 

Via Gust MEES, T@T lab

Look into the key elements that are needed to re-design an appropriate learning space for 21 century.

Via THE OFFICIAL ANDREASCY

Digital Pedagogy Lab : Prince Edward Island : Second Reflections Welcome address at Digital Pedagogy Lab : UPEI The recent pedagogy lab on Prince Edward Island was split into two tracks, Digital Literacies and Networks. My experience was mostly with the network track, focusing on the nature of digital networks and network-building. Although, with a…

Via Dr. Susan Bainbridge