Hematology

Abstract

With optimal target antigen selection antibody-based therapeutics can be very effective agents for hematologic malignancies, but none have yet been approved for myeloma. Rituximab and brentuximab vedotin are examples of success for the naked antibody and antibody–drug conjugate classes, respectively. Plasma cell myeloma is an attractive disease for antibody-based targeting due to target cell accessibility and the complementary mechanism of action with approved therapies. Initial antibodies tested in myeloma were disappointing. However, recent results from targeting well-characterized antigens have been more encouraging. In particular, the CD38 and CD138 targeted therapies are showing single-agent activity in early phase clinical trials. Here we will review the development pipeline for naked antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates for myeloma. There is clear clinical need for new treatments, as myeloma inevitably becomes refractory to standard agents. The full impact is yet to be established, but we are optimistic that the first FDA-approved antibody therapeutic(s) for this disease will emerge in the near future.

Via Krishan Maggon

RT @PiescheM: How to train your T cell: Genetically engineered #CART cells vs #BiTE in B-cell #ALL http://t.co/PbUpbuLwuk #bioengineering

 

Antigen-specific T cell–based immunotherapy is getting its day in the sun. The contemporaneous development of two potent CD19-specific immunotherapeutic modalities for the treatment of B-cell malignancies provides exciting opportunities for patients, physicians and scientists alike. Patients with relapsed, refractory or poor-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) previously had few therapeutic options and now have two potential new lifelines. Physicians will have the choice between two powerful modalities and indeed could potentially enroll some patients on trials exploring both modalities if needed. For scientists interested in tumor immunology, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and of bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) provides unprecedented opportunities to explore the promise and limitations of antigen-specific T-cell therapy in the context of human leukemia. In this article, we compare chimeric antigen receptor T cells and BiTEs targeting CD19 in B-cell ALL in the setting of the available clinical literature.

Via Krishan Maggon