Immunology and Biotherapies
38.0K views | +1 today
Immunology and Biotherapies
Page Ressources et Actualités du DIU immunologie et biothérapies
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Vaccines Collection
Scoop.it!

The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma

Findings

The anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents have been reported to have impressive antitumor effects in several malignancies, including melanoma. The greatest clinical activity in unselected patients has been seen in melanoma. Tumor expression of PD-L1 is a suggestive, but inadequate, biomarker predictive of response to immune-checkpoint blockade. However, tumors expressing little or no PD-L1 are less likely to respond to PD-1 pathway blockade. Combination checkpoint blockade with PD-1 plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade appears to improve response rates in patients who are less likely to respond to single-checkpoint blockade. Toxicity with PD-1 blocking agents is less than the toxicity with previous immunotherapies (eg, interleukin 2, CTLA-4 blockade). Certain adverse events can be severe and potentially life threatening, but most can be prevented or reversed with close monitoring and appropriate management.

Implications

This family of immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefits not only patients with metastatic melanoma but also those with historically less responsive tumor types. Although a subset of patients responds to single-agent blockade, the initial trial of checkpoint-inhibitor combinations has reported a potential to improve response rates. Combination therapies appear to be a means of increasing response rates, albeit with increased immune-related adverse events. As these treatments become available to patients, education regarding the recognition and management of immune-related effects of immune-checkpoint blockade will be essential for maximizing clinical benefit.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, May 15, 2015 4:02 AM

doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018

 

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 37, Issue 4, 1 April 2015, Pages 764–782

Review Article The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in MelanomaKathleen M. Mahoney, MD, PhD1, 2, , , Gordon J. Freeman, PhD2, David F. McDermott, MD1

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Current state of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 agents in cancer therapy

Abstract

Immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer is rapidly evolving from therapies that globally and non-specifically simulate the immune system to more targeted activation of individual components of the immune system. The net result of this targeted approach is decreased toxicity and increased efficacy of immunotherapy. More specifically, therapies that inhibit the interaction between programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), present on the surface of tumor or antigen-presenting cells, and programmed death 1 (PD-1), present on the surface of activated lymphocytes, are generating much excitement and enthusiasm, even in malignancies that are not traditionally considered to be immunogenic. Herein, we review the current landscape of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapies in the world of oncology. We have performed a comprehensive literature search on the data available through PubMed, Medline, Scopus, the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, and abstracts from major oncology meetings in order to summarize the clinical data of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, March 9, 2015 6:20 AM

Highlights

 

Immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors are revolutionizing the care for patients with cancer.

Specifically, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents have demonstrated marked clinical success in a wide range of malignancies by providing durable benefits with minimal toxicities.

Herein, we review the pre-clinical and clinical activity of these agents in multiple malignancies.

In addition, we review areas that need further development in order to improve the clinical efficacy of these agents.

 

doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.009

 

Molecular Immunology

Available online 5 March 2015

In Press, Corrected Proof — Note to users

Review Current state of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 agents in cancer therapy ☆Abhisek Swaika, William A. Hammond, Richard W. Joseph, 
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Newly Presented Data Shows That Peregrine Pharmaceuticals' PS-Targeting Antibodies Significantly Enhance Anti-Tumor Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors PD-1 and CTLA-4 in Models of Breast Canc...

TUSTIN, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 02/09/15 -- Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPHM) (NASDAQ: PPHMP) today announced preclinical data presentations showing that the PS-targeting antibody equivalent to bavituximab combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody displayed statistically significant improvement in tumor fighting immune cells, activation signals and cytokines in a model of melanoma compared to anti-PD-1 alone. Moreover, cells that suppress the immune system from recognizing tumors, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), were reduced by more than 40% in the combination with the PS-targeting antibody versus anti-PD-1 alone. These data, further validating the immune-stimulatory mechanism of bavituximab, are outlined in an oral and poster presentation byBruce Freimark, Ph.D., director, preclinical oncology research at Peregrine, to be made at the Keystone Tumor Immunology: Multidisciplinary Science Driving Combination Therapy meeting being held February 8-13, 2015 in Banff, Alberta, Canada. Peregrine's lead PS-targeting antibody, bavituximab, is currently being evaluated in second-line non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as part of the SUNRISE pivotal Phase III clinical trial.


In the presentations titled: "Antibody-Mediated Blockade of Phosphatidylserine Enhances the Anti-Tumor Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors by Affecting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) and Lymphocyte Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment", Dr. Freimark and his research group, along with colleagues from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center led by Xianming Huang, Ph.D., demonstrate that in immunocompetent preclinical models of breast cancer and melanoma, the combination of PS-targeting antibodies and anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 antibodies demonstrate statistically significant anti-tumor responses than either anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 antibody alone. New data presented show statistically significant changes in levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), a type of white blood cell implicated in killing tumor cells, in the PS-targeting and anti-PD-1 combination group over single treatment alone in a melanoma model. Specifically, data show increases in a number of markers used to determine immune activation, including CD3 and CD8 cells expressing PD-1, Lag-3 and CD137 (4-1BB). Furthermore, data show that CD8 T cells in the tumor had increased production of IFN-gamma and TNF-α, both known to assist in promoting immune activation and Granzyme-B which is involved in direct tumor killing.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, February 10, 2015 2:37 AM
PS-Targeting Antibodies Block Tumor Suppression of Immune System Allowing Development of Robust Immune Responses Resulting in Statistically Significant Improvement in Anti-Tumor Activity; Specific Effects Seen in Decreased Levels of MDSCs and Other Immunosuppressive Lymphocytes and Increases in Tumor Fighting Immune Cells
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it
Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies http://t.co/4XGxIKdg1U #immunotherapy #lungcancer #awareness #LCAM @OxfordJournals

 

Abstract

Despite extensive investigation over the past three decades, cancer immunotherapy has produced limited success, with few agents achieving approval by the Food and Drug Administration and even the most effective helping only a minority of patients, primarily with melanoma or renal cancer. In recent years, immune checkpoints that maintain physiologic self-tolerance have been implicated in the down-regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Efforts to restore latent anti-tumor immunity have focused on antibody-based interventions targeting CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes and its principal ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells. Ipilimumab, an antibody targeting CTLA-4, appears to restore tumor immunity at the priming phase, whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies restore immune function in the tumor microenvironment. Although ipilimumab can produce durable long-term responses in patients with advanced melanoma, it is associated with significant immune-related toxicities. By contrast, antibodies targeting either PD-1 or PD-L1 have produced significant anti-tumor activity with considerably less toxicity. Activity was seen in patients with melanoma and renal cancer, as well as those with non-small-cell lung, bladder and head and neck cancers, tumors not previously felt to be sensitive to immunotherapy. The tolerability of PD-1-pathway blockers and their unique mechanism of action have made them ideal backbones for combination regimen development. Combination approaches involving cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, alternative immune-checkpoint inhibitors, immunostimulatory cytokines and cancer vaccines are currently under clinical investigation. Current efforts focus on registration trials of single agents and combinations in various diseases and disease settings and identifying predictive biomarkers of response.

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesTable 1.

Antibodies that target the PD-1 axis and are undergoing clinical investigation for cancer

 TargetAntibodyMolecular structureClinical development phaseTumor types in evaluationPD-1Nivolumab (BMS-936558)Fully human IgG4Phase IIIMelanoma, RCC, NSCLC, HNSCCPembrolizumab (MK-3475)Humanized IgG4Phase IIIMelanoma, NSCLCPidilizumab (CT-011)Humanized IgG1κPhase IIHEME, melanomaPD-L1BMS-936559Fully human IgG4Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsMPDL3280AFully human IgG1Phase IMelanoma, RCC, NSCLCPhase IIUROMEDI4736Fully human IgG1Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IIINSCLCMSB0010718CFully human IgG1Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IIMerkel cell carcinoma
Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 15, 2014 1:38 AM

Review of the current status of active PD1/PDL1 projects                    

 

 

Int. Immunol. (2014)doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu095                                     First published online: October 16, 2014

 

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesGeorge K. Philips1 and Michael Atkins2

+Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20007, USA2 Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Research Building-E501, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20057, USACorrespondence to: G. K. Philips; E-mail: george.k.philips@gunet.georgetown.eduReceived September 4, 2014.Accepted October 3, 2014.
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 15, 2014 2:06 AM

Review of the current status of active PD1/PDL1 projects                    

 

 

Int. Immunol. (2014)doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu095                                     First published online: October 16, 2014

 

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesGeorge K. Philips1 and Michael Atkins2

+Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20007, USA2 Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Research Building-E501, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20057, USACorrespondence to: G. K. Philips; E-mail: george.k.philips@gunet.georgetown.eduReceived September 4, 2014.Accepted October 3, 2014.

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety of Nivolumab (Anti–Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety of Nivolumab (Anti–Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it
"OS & Long-Term Safety of #Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced #NSCLC" JCO http://t.co/TjxJ8tP1Sr

 

Purpose Programmed death 1 is an immune checkpoint that suppresses antitumor immunity. Nivolumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G4 programmed death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, was active and generally well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors treated in a phase I trial with expansion cohorts. We report overall survival (OS), response durability, and long-term safety in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving nivolumab in this trial.

Patients and Methods Patients (N = 129) with heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC received nivolumab 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 2 weeks in 8-week cycles for up to 96 weeks. Tumor burden was assessed by RECIST (version 1.0) after each cycle.

Results Median OS across doses was 9.9 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 42%, 24%, and 18%, respectively, across doses and 56%, 42%, and 27%, respectively, at the 3-mg/kg dose (n = 37) chosen for further clinical development. Among 22 patients (17%) with objective responses, estimated median response duration was 17.0 months. An additional six patients (5%) had unconventional immune-pattern responses. Response rates were similar in squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. Eighteen responding patients discontinued nivolumab for reasons other than progressive disease; nine (50%) of those had responses lasting > 9 months after their last dose. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14% of patients. Three treatment-related deaths (2% of patients) occurred, each associated with pneumonitis.

Conclusion Nivolumab monotherapy produced durable responses and encouraging survival rates in patients with heavily pretreated NSCLC. Randomized clinical trials with nivolumab in advanced NSCLC are ongoing.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, April 21, 2015 2:09 AM

 

Published online before printApril 20, 2015, doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3708JCO April 20, 2015JCO.2014.58.3708

 

Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety of Nivolumab (Anti–Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerScott N. Gettinger⇑, Leora Horn, Leena Gandhi, David R. Spigel,Scott J. Antonia, Naiyer A. Rizvi, John D. Powderly, Rebecca S. Heist,Richard D. Carvajal, David M. Jackman, Lecia V. Sequist, David C. Smith,Philip Leming, David P. Carbone, Mary C. Pinder-Schenck,Suzanne L. Topalian, F. Stephen Hodi, Jeffrey A. Sosman, Mario Sznol,David F. McDermott, Drew M. Pardoll, Vindira Sankar, Christoph M. Ahlers,Mark Salvati, Jon M. Wigginton, Matthew D. Hellmann, Georgia D. Kollia,Ashok K. Gupta and Julie R. Brahmer

+Author Affiliations

Scott N. Gettinger and Mario Sznol, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Leora Horn, David P. Carbone, and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; David R. Spigel, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Leena Gandhi, David M. Jackman, and F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Rebecca S. Heist and Lecia V. Sequist, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Scott J. Antonia and Mary C. Pinder-Schenck, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; Naiyer A. Rizvi, Richard D. Carvajal, and Matthew D. Hellmann, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Philip Leming, Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Suzanne L. Topalian, Drew M. Pardoll, and Julie R. Brahmer, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; and Vindira Sankar, Christoph M. Ahlers, Mark Salvati, Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok K. Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.Corresponding author: Scott N. Gettinger, MD, Yale Cancer Center, 333 Cedar St, FMP127, New Haven, CT 06520; e-mail: scott.gettinger@yale.edu.

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it

Abstract

 

In recent years, immune checkpoints that maintain physiologic self-tolerance have been implicated in the down-regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Efforts to restore latent anti-tumor immunity have focused on antibody-based interventions targeting CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes and its principal ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells. Ipilimumab, an antibody targeting CTLA-4, appears to restore tumor immunity at the priming phase, whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies restore immune function in the tumor microenvironment. Although ipilimumab can produce durable long-term responses in patients with advanced melanoma, it is associated with significant immune-related toxicities. By contrast, antibodies targeting either PD-1 or PD-L1 have produced significant anti-tumor activity with considerably less toxicity. Activity was seen in patients with melanoma and renal cancer, as well as those with non-small-cell lung, bladder and head and neck cancers, tumors not previously felt to be sensitive to immunotherapy. The tolerability of PD-1-pathway blockers and their unique mechanism of action have made them ideal backbones for combination regimen development. Combination approaches involving cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, alternative immune-checkpoint inhibitors, immunostimulatory cytokines and cancer vaccines are currently under clinical investigation. Current efforts focus on registration trials of single agents and combinations in various diseases and disease settings and identifying predictive biomarkers of response.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, March 3, 2015 12:18 PM
George K. Philips and Michael AtkinsTherapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Int. Immunol. (2015) 27 (1): 39-46 doi:10.1093/intimm/dxu095

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Clinical blockade of PD1 and LAG3 [mdash] potential mechanisms of action : Nature Reviews Immunology : Nature Publishing Group

Clinical blockade of PD1 and LAG3 [mdash] potential mechanisms of action : Nature Reviews Immunology : Nature Publishing Group | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it

Dysfunctional T cells can render the immune system unable to eliminate infections and cancer. Therapeutic targeting of the surface receptors that inhibit T cell function has begun to show remarkable success in clinical trials. In this Review, we discuss the potential mechanisms of action of the clinical agents that target two of these receptors, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG3). We also suggest correlative studies that may define the predominant mechanisms of action and identify predictive biomarkers.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, December 24, 2014 3:06 AM
Clinical blockade of PD1 and LAG3 — potential mechanisms of actionLinh T. Nguyen& Pamela S. OhashiAffiliationsCorresponding authorsNature Reviews Immunology 15, 45–56 (2015) doi:10.1038/nri3790Published online 23 December 2014