Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Harold Jarche maps Personal Knowledge Mastery (PKM) against Dave Snowden's Cynefin Framework. In this he looks at things from the perspective of structure and abstraction and concludes that in the more complex domains the teams, communities nd networks that form need to be less permanent and more flexible. Via Matthew Farmer, juandoming 
Scoop.it!
La complexité n'est-elle pas devenue une caractéristique de nos sociétés, plutôt qu'un bug ? Comment pourrions-nous regagner le contrôle de nos flots d'information, de notre temps ? Pouvons-nous aborder la complexité d'une façon plus productive ? Pouvons-nous mieux la comprendre, mieux la maîtriser ? Tel étaient les questions adressées par les organisateurs de la seconde édition de la conférence Lift France, à la fois à un designer, à un vidéaste et à une ethnologue. Forcément, cela a apporté des réponses multiples. Via MERGEL, Philippe Vallat
|
|
The concept of Personal Knowledge Mastery is growing in popularity as we all seek to make sense of what our best next step should be in this incredibly complex world. PKM offers an approach that connects work with learning and at its heart is a principle of seeking information, making sense of it and sharing it in a reciprocal manner with others that broadens understanding and can lead to new insights and action.
In this article Harold Jarche (the leading author on PKM) argues that in more complex realms the groups (teams, communities and networks) that form to address knowledge areas need to be more open, informal and transient to be able to deal with the issues at hand. This suggests that the kind of leadership qualities that need to be developed to be successful in these complex times are those associated with being open, humble, curious, flexible and trustworthy.