Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Sociology was approved by the ACRL Board of Directors on 27 January 2022, as a Companion Document to the ACRL IL Framework. "Developed by the ACRL Anthropology and Sociology Section’s Instruction and Information Literacy Committee, the companion document defines Sociological Information Literacy as an understanding of how information and scholarship are created, published, disseminated, and used by individuals and organizations. The document describes connections between the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy and the Sociological Literacy Framework (SLF) developed by sociology professors Susan Ferguson and William Carbonaro.
Last week, I introduced the COUP framework, which is a great framework to start with OER research. However, some categories of the COUP framework have been researched more extensively than others. For example, one of the biggest “selling points” of OER is cost. But is a free resource always the better option if students don’t achieve good grades in the end?
While it is perfectly normal to be inspired by the newest, most exciting learning technologies, district and school leaders must remember that educational technologies’ successful implementations require careful thought and planning. There are countless stories of failed ed-tech implementations because of a lack of planning.
Via EDTECH@UTRGV
Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu) The teaching professions face rapidly changing demands, which require a new, broader and more sophisticated set of competences than before. The ubiquity of digital devices and applications, in particular, requires educators to develop their digital competence. The European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) is a scientifically sound framework describing what it means for educators to be digitally competent. It provides a general reference frame to support the development of educator-specific digital competences in Europe. DigCompEdu is directed towards educators at all levels of education, from early childhood to higher and adult education, including general and vocational education and training, special needs education, and non-formal learning contexts.
RAT is an assessment framework for understanding technology’s role in teaching, learning and curricular practices, originally developed for PK-12 education, but it has been applied in higher education, especially in pre-service teacher education. The original purpose of the RAT framework was to introduce it as a self-assessment for preservice and inservice teachers to increase critical technological decision-making.
Via Ana Cristina Pratas, THE OFFICIAL ANDREASCY
Digital Literacy is increasingly important in an age where many students read as much on screens as they do from books. In fact, the very definition of many of these terms is changing as the overlap across media forms increases. Interactive eBooks can function like both long-form blogs and traditional books. Threaded email can look and function like social media. Email and texting and social media messaging are increasingly similar.
Developing digital literacies is critical to engaging with our digital future.
The La Trobe University (LTU) Digital Literacies Framework supports the University’s Digital Future: Digital Learning Strategy 2015–2017 and its strategic focus areas that rely on digital literacies: * preparing students for an increasingly digital future * providing a high quality online learning environment
This Framework supports these strategic focus areas by outlining the attitudes and capabilities that LTU staff and students need in a digitally connected world.
Library Guides. Information Literacy Program. Framework.
The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) released in February 2015 the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. This framework expands on the standards (detailed in the box below), and "grows out of a belief that information literacy as an educational reform movement will realize its potential only through a richer, more complex set of core ideas." (ACRL) The Framework is organized into six frames, each consisting of a concept central to information literacy, a set of knowledge practices, and a set of dispositions. The six concepts that anchor the frames are presented alphabetically: Authority Is Constructed and Contextual Information Creation as a Process Information Has Value Research as Inquiry Scholarship as Conversation Searching as Strategic Exploration ACRL, librarians, and faculty are continually working together to better understand how to apply the Framework to higher education curriculum. For updates, community feedback, and a shared "toolbox" of assignments, assessments, and curriculum examples, please visit the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education Wordpress site.
A Comprehensive Framework For Student Motivation
The aim of our TEL Quality Framework is to assist staff to meaningfully incorporate technology into learning, teaching & assessment, using the principles of the 3E Framework. Frameworks for tec...
An introduction to the Information Literacy Framework and Portal for health information. Presented by Eilean Craig and Rob Westwood at the CILIPS Centenary Con…
When the Standards for Information Literacy Competency in Higher Education [http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency ] came out in 2000, I thought they were a step forward. We were broadening our concept of information literacy, which was (at last) far more than the nuts and bolts of how to use a library. I thought at the time that it made it very clear that information literacy had to be a campus-wide endeavor, not a library project.
What is digital literacy and how is it different from information literacy? Digital literacy includes the ability to find and use information (otherwise known as information literacy) but goes beyond this to encompass communication, collaboration and teamwork, social awareness in the digital environment, understanding of e-safety and creation of new information. Both digital and information literacy are underpinned by critical thinking and evaluation. What does the DIL framework cover and how is it structured? For the purposes of the DIL framework, digital literacy refers to the skills, competences, and dispositions of OU students using digital technologies to achieve personal, study, and work-related goals. The framework describes five ‘stages of development’ of digital literacy skills, competences and dispositions and maps them against the ‘levels’ of OU study.
|
Blogging is a digital activity with immense pedagogical benefits for students. Besides developing a number of key multimedia literacy skills essential for thriving in the 21st century classroom, blogging also empowers students voice and helps them communicate more effectively.
The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework allows us to understand the importance of utilizing web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Social annotation tools such as Hypothes.is allow teachers to fulfil the three essential UDL components: engagement, representation, and action & expression through thoughtful use of the platform. Social annotation tools such as Hypothesis and Voice Thread, when used well, boost student engagement, enhance critical thinking, expand reading comprehension, and increase student interaction. Of the several social annotation tools currently available, our institution uses Hypothesis. Hypothesis’ motto—“Making reading active, visible and social”—sums up why we think social annotation is so valuable for our students: it engages students and invites them to read and think together as a group by sharing real-time annotations of websites or PDFs (Hypothesis, 2021). The richly multimodal, interactive nature of Hypothesis offers instructors a platform through which they can employ the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to improve engagement and accessibility for all learners.
Vice-chancellors and senior executives from more than 40 UK universities have contributed to a new framework, launched today, to help higher education leaders realise the benefits of a long-term strategic approach to digital technology.
Key takeaways - Explicitly teach writing. Don’t just assign writing tasks and hope for the best. Instead, break writing instruction down into manageable chunks for students to tackle using deliberate practice activities.
- Teach students how to write great sentences. Sentences are the building blocks of excellent writing, so writing instruction needs to give students plenty of practice at sentence-level writing
- Embed writing into the teaching of content. Don’t see this as another thing to teach on top of content; instead, use writing instruction to deepen students’ engagement with what they’re learning.
- Teach grammar as you teach writing. Stifle the yawn and let your students in on the secrets of excellent writing, this includes teaching the proper structure and function of great sentences while they write.
Knowing how to write is an essential skill. Constructing written work that effectively explains, informs or persuades helps students succeed in school, and later in their working lives. People spend a lot of time at work using network tools that require them to write. Email, social media and text messaging mean that whatever path students choose in life, their ability to communicate thoughts and ideas effectively in writing sets them up to thrive. Unfortunately, schools don’t always teach writing very well. Teachers often ask students to complete a lot of writing but less frequently carve out instructional time to explicitly teach students how to build effective sentences and combine these sentences into effective paragraphs and essays. Thankfully, Judith Hochman and Natalie Wexler have a book that tells you exactly how to teach your students to be better writers. The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades provides a comprehensive school-wide framework for developing better writers and is jam-packed full of classroom-ready activities and strategies.
As the teaching professions face rapidly changing demands, educators require an increasingly broad and more sophisticated set of competences than before. In particular the ubiquity of digital devices and the duty to help students become digitally competent requires educators to develop their own digital competence. On International and national level a number of frameworks, self-assessment tools and training programmes have been developed to describe the facets of digital competence for educators and to help them assess their competence, identify their training needs and offer targeted training.
(2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J: Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 201-218. doi: 10.1080/09687760500376439
E-learning is in a rather extraordinary position. It was born as a ‘tool’ and now finds itself in the guise of a somewhat wobbly arrow of change. In practice, changing the way thousands of teachers teach, learners learn, innovation is promoted and sustainable change in traditional institutions is achieved across hundreds of different disciplines is a demanding endeavour that will not be achieved by learning technologies alone. It involves art, craft and science as well as technology. This paper attempts to show how it might be possible to capture and model complex strategic processes that will help move the potential of e-learning in universities to a new stage of development. It offers the example of a four-quadrant model created as a framework for an e-learning strategy.
The JRC has designed the first pan-European conceptual model to help educational organisations self-assess the use and integration of digital technologies and resources in the learning process. The framework also supports policymakers in devising policies for their effective deployment at regional, national and European level. This work supports the European Commission’s objectives to improve digital skills and learning and the initiative Opening up Education which aims to stimulate ways of learning and teaching through digital technologies and digital content.
This framework* has been designed by the HEA to support you in offering students choices in how, what, when and where they learn: the pace, place and mode of delivery. There are multiple benefits of flexible learning. It can empower students to become independent and autonomous, and can help foster graduate attributes that will enable individuals to manage the complexities of 21st century life. When well supported, flexible learning can positively impact upon student recruitment, retention and progression as well as widening participation.
Helping Students Fail: A Framework
5 Dimensions Of Critical Digital Literacy: A Framework Digital Literacy is increasingly important in an age where many students read as much on screens as they do from books. In fact, the very definition of many of these terms is changing as the overlap across media forms increases. Interactive eBooks can function like both long-form blogs and traditional books. Threaded email can look and function like social media. Email and texting and social media messaging are increasingly similar.
The five resources of critical digital literacy: a framework for curriculum integration. This article sets out a framework for a critical digital literacy curriculum derived from the four resources, or reader roles, model of critical literacy developed by Luke and Freebody (1990). We suggest that specific problematics in academic engagement with and curriculum development for digital literacy have occurred through an overly technocratic and acritical framing and that this situation calls for a critical perspective, drawing on theories and pedagogies from critical literacy and media education. The article explores the consonance and dissonance between the forms, scope and requirements of traditional print/media and the current digital environment, emphasising the knowledge and operational dimensions that inform literacy in digital contexts. It offers a re-interpretation of the four resources framed as critical digital literacy (Decoding, Meaning Making, Using and Analysing) and elaborates the model further with a fifth resource (Persona). The article concludes by identifying implications for institutional practice.
|