NeuroImmunology
8.2K views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Multiple sclerosis New Drugs Review
Scoop.it!

Daclizumab (anti-CD25) in multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a typical CD4 T cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that leads to inflammation, demyelination, axonal damage, glial scarring and a broad range of neurological deficits. While disease-modifying drugs with a good safety profile and moderate efficacy have been available for 20 years now, a growing number of substances with superior therapeutic efficacy have recently been introduced or are in late stage clinical testing. Daclizumab, a humanized neutralizing monoclonal antibody against the α-chain of the Interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Rα, CD25), which had originally been developed and approved to prevent rejection after allograft renal transplantation, belongs to the latter group.

 

Clinical efficacy and safety of daclizumab in MS has so far been tested in several smaller phase II trials and recently two large phase II trials (combined 912 patients), and has shown efficacy regarding reduction of clinical disease activity as well as CNS inflammation. A phase III clinical trial is ongoing till March 2014 (DECIDE study, comparison with interferon (IFN) β-1a in RRMS). Furthermore, the existing safety data from clinical experience in kidney transplantation and in MS appears favorable.

 

Apart from the promising clinical data mechanistic studies along the trials have provided interesting novel insights not only about the mechanisms of daclizumab treatment, but in general about the biology of IL-2 and IL-2 receptor interactions in the human immune system. Besides blockade of recently activated CD25+T cells daclizumab appears to act through additional mechanisms including the expansion of immune regulatory CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells, the blockade of cross-presentation of IL-2 by dendritic cells (DC) to T cells, and the reduction of lymphoid tissue inducer cells.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 5, 2014 6:16 AM
Experimental Neurology

Volume 262, Part A, December 2014, Pages 44–51

Special Issue: Progress in MS pathophysiology and treatment

Review Daclizumab (anti-CD25) in multiple sclerosisNikolai Pfender , Roland Martin,   DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.015
Scooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Multiple sclerosis New Drugs Review
Scoop.it!

Randomized phase I trials of the safety/tolerability of anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody BIIB033

Randomized phase I trials of the safety/tolerability of anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody BIIB033 | NeuroImmunology | Scoop.it

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BIIB033 (anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody) in healthy volunteers and participants with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: In 2 separate randomized, placebo-controlled studies, single ascending doses (SAD; 0.1–100 mg/kg) of BIIB033 or placebo were administered via IV infusion or subcutaneous injection to 72 healthy volunteers, and multiple ascending doses (MAD; 0.3–100 mg/kg; 2 doses separated by 14 days) of BIIB033 or placebo were administered via IV infusion to 47 participants with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring, neurologic examinations, conventional and nonconventional MRI, EEG, optical coherence tomography, retinal examinations, and evoked potentials. Serum and CSF PK as well as the immunogenicity of BIIB033 were also evaluated.

Results: All 72 healthy volunteers and 47 participants with MS were included in the safety analyses. BIIB033 infusions were well tolerated. The frequency of AEs was similar between BIIB033 and placebo. There were no serious AEs or deaths. No clinically significant changes in any of the safety measures were observed. BIIB033 PK was similar between healthy volunteers and participants with MS. Doses of ≥10 mg/kg resulted in BIIB033 concentrations similar to or higher than the concentration associated with 90% of the maximum remyelination effect in rat remyelination studies. The incidence of anti-drug antibody production was low.

Conclusions: The emerging safety, tolerability, and PK of BIIB033 support advancing BIIB033 into phase II clinical development as a potential treatment for CNS demyelination disorders.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that BIIB033 is well tolerated and safe (serious adverse event rate 0%, 95% confidence interval 0–7.6%).


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 28, 2014 7:36 AM
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLERandomized phase I trials of the safety/tolerability of anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody BIIB033Jonathan Q. Tran, PharmD, Jitesh Rana, MD, Frederik Barkhof, MD, Isaac Melamed, MD, Hakop Gevorkyan, MD,Mike P. Wattjes, MD, Remko de Jong, MSc, Kristin Brosofsky, MPH, Soma Ray, PhD, Lei Xu, PhD, Jim Zhao, PhD,Edward Parr, PhD and Diego Cadavid, MD

+SHOW AFFILIATIONS

| + SHOW FULL DISCLOSURES

Correspondence to Dr. Cadavid: diego.cadavid@biogenidec.comPublished online August 27, 2014 doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000018Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation August 27, 2014 vol. 1 no. 2 e18
Scooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Alzheimer's Disease R&D Review
Scoop.it!

Molecular Neurodegeneration | Full text | Immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease: hoops and hurdles

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, afflicting more than 30 million people worldwide. Currently, there is no cure or way to prevent this devastating disease.

Via Krishan Maggon
Gilbert C FAURE's insight:
Abstract

.... Extracellular plaques, containing various forms of amyloid-β protein (Aβ), and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), composed of hyper-phosphorylated tau protein, are two major pathological hallmarks of the AD brain. Aggregation, deposition, and N-terminal modification of Aβ protein and tau phosphorylation and aggregation are thought to precede the onset of cognitive decline, which is better correlated with tangle formation and neuron loss. Active and passive vaccines against various forms of Aβ have shown promise in pre-clinical animal models. However, translating these results safely and effectively into humans has been challenging. Recent clinical trials showed little or no cognitive efficacy, possibly due to the fact that the aforementioned neurodegenerative processes most likely pre-existed in the patients well before the start of immunotherapy. Efforts are now underway to treat individuals at risk for AD prior to or in the earliest stages of cognitive decline with the hope of preventing or delaying the onset of the disease. In addition, efforts to immunize against tau and other AD-related targets are underway.

Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 2, 2014 1:56 AM

Review

Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: hoops and hurdles

Cynthia A Lemere

Correspondence: Cynthia A Lemere clemere@partners.org

Author Affiliations

Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, NRB 636F, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston 02115, MA, USA

Molecular Neurodegeneration 2013, 8:36  doi:10.1186/1750-1326-8-36


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:http://www.molecularneurodegeneration.com/content/8/1/36


Received:3 July 2013Accepted:23 September 2013Published:22 October 2013

© 2013 Lemere; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.