real utopias
33.2K views | +0 today
Follow
real utopias
Not TINA (There Is No Alternative) but TAPAS: THERE ARE PLENTY OF ALTERNATIVES
Curated by jean lievens
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Noam Chomsky - Exposing Religious Lies

Noam Chomsky Exposing Religious Lies

No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Noam Chomsky - New Atheists, Islamophobia and the War on Terror

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btJfkPBLULg

No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Noam Chomsky Stefan Molyneux & Chris Hedges On Why Sam Harris & Richard Dawkins Are Religious Extrem

No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Noam Chomsky on Religion - YouTube

Chomsky on religion and faith.
No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

DEBATE: Noam Chomsky VS Edip Yuksel "DOES GOD EXIST?"

MUST WATCH!! Chomsky Vs Yuksel on "Does God Exist?"
No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Socialism is the Plain Meaning of the Text: The Gospel of Matthew and a General Anthropology of Social Revolution

Socialism is the Plain Meaning of the Text:  The Gospel of Matthew and a General Anthropology of Social Revolution | real utopias | Scoop.it

Rather curiously for a man who has been described as “arguably the most important intellectual alive” (New York Times) and who has been quoted as much as the Bible, Plato, Marx, and Freud, Noam Chomsky has made something of a career (or at least a part of it) by doing something so simple a ten year old could do it: pointing out things Adam Smith wrote — literally.  He has pointed out, for instance, how Smith’s one reference to the Invisible Hand is part of his condemnation of what is today called “neoliberal globalization,” which, naturally, it is today used to support.  And Chomsky has done similar things, pointing out things Adam Smith has said, including his various remarks on the division of labour, which he argues will make men stupid and ignorant; equality of condition, which is his ethical ideal; and power relations, which suggest that the merchant class dictates policies in its own interests.  And if my use of the term ‘pointed out,’ seems rather odd, rather too simple for the world’s most prominent intellectual, that is because the situation itself is rather odd.  In an interview with Chomsky, the interviewer David Barsamian suggests, “You’ve done some pretty impressive research on Smith that has excavated … a lot of information that’s not coming out …” but before he finishes his statement, Chomsky interrupts him: “I didn’t do any research at all on Smith. I just read him. There’s no research. Just read it,” and continues, “the version of him [Smith] that’s given today is just ridiculous. But I didn’t have to any research to find this out. All you have to do is read. If you’re literate, you’ll find it out.”[1]  As Chomsky is right to point out, it is not remarkable that he read these things in Smith — he is looking at their plain and obvious meaning; it’s right there before one’s eyes.  What is indeed remarkable is that intellectuals — economists, mostly — do not see it.

 
No comment yet.
Curated by jean lievens
Economist, specialized in political economy and peer-to-peer dynamics; core member of the P2P Foundation