Why Viruses like Herpes and Zika will Need to be Reclassified | Virus World | Scoop.it

New findings reveal many different structural models, which can eventually lead to developing more targeted antiviral vaccines. New research reveals that the way viruses were perceived in terms of their architecture will need to be retooled, because they are actually structured in many more patterns than previously understood. The findings could have significant impact on how they are classified, our understanding of how they form, evolve and infect hosts, and strategies to identify ways to design vaccines to target them.

 

In the 1950s and ’60s as scientists began to obtain high resolution images of viruses, they discovered the detailed structure of the capsid – an outer protective layer composed of multiple copies of the same protein – which protects the virus’ genetic material. The majority of viruses have capsids that are typically quasi-spherical and display icosahedral symmetry – like a 20-sided dice for instance. The capsid shell is what protects them, and as scientists discovered their structure, they proposed that capsids could have different sizes and hold different amounts of genome, and therefore could infect hosts differently.

 

Why this matters

 When designing drugs to target viruses, scientists can now take their varying structural shapes into account to improve efficacy.

Two researchers who study the structures of viruses, Antoni Luque, a theoretical biophysicist at San Diego State University and a member of its Viral Information Institute, and Reidun Twarock, a mathematical biologist from the University of York, UK, and a member of York’s Cross-disciplinary Centre for Systems Analysis, show that many viruses have essentially been misclassified for 60 years, including common viruses such as Herpes simplex and Zika. This was because despite having the structural images from cryo-electron microscopy, we did not have the mathematical description of many of the architectures of different viruses.

“We discovered six new ways in which proteins can organize to form icosahedral capsid shells,” Luque said. “So, many viruses don’t adopt only the two broadly understood capsid architectures. There are now at least eight ways in which their icosahedral capsids could be designed.”

 

Biotech applications

 Structural biologists can now take this information and reclassify the structure of the viruses, which will help unveil molecular and evolutionary relationships between different viruses. 

It will also provide a guide to engineer new molecular containers for nanotech and biotech applications, and it will help scientists to identify specific strategies to target the assembly of proteins in the capsid. This can eventually lead to a more systematic approach to developing antiviral vaccines. “We can use this discovery to target both the assembly and stability of the capsid, to either prevent the formation of the virus when it infects the host cell, or break it apart after it’s formed,” Luque said. “This could facilitate the characterization and identification of antiviral targets for viruses sharing the same icosahedral layout.”

 

This new framework accommodates viruses that were previously outliers, provides new predictions of viral capsid architectures, and has identified common geometrical patterns among distant evolutionary related viruses that infect everyone from humans to bacteria. Twarock said the new blueprints also provide “a new perspective on viral evolution, suggesting novel routes in which larger and more complex viruses may have evolved from simple ones at evolutionary timescales.”

 

 

Published on Sept. 27, 2019 in Nature Communications: 

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12367-3